Algoritma Moral: Rekonstruksi Agency Etis Peserta Didik Dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Era Kecerdasan Buatan

Badrus Shalih; Marzuqi Marzuqi; Zainal  Abidin

doi:10.62504/scientiva36

Penulis

Badrus Shalih universitas agama islam internasional darullughah wadda`wah Penulis
Marzuqi Universitas Islam Internasional Darullughah Wadda`wah Penulis
Zainal Abidin Universitas Islam Internasional Darullughah Wadda`wah Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62504/scientiva36

Kata Kunci:

AI Ethics, Ethical Agency, Islamic Education, Moral Algorithm

Abstrak

Kemajuan kecerdasan buatan (AI) yang pesat membawa implikasi mendalam terhadap tatanan moral dan etika peserta didik, khususnya dalam konteks Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis disrupsi AI terhadap perkembangan moral siswa, melakukan kritik epistemologis terhadap pendekatan PAI yang ada, serta merumuskan model rekonstruksi agency etis berbasis nilai-nilai Islam. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif konseptual dengan metode library research, kajian ini mengintegrasikan perspektif filsafat moral Islam, teori moral agency kontemporer, dan analisis kritikal terhadap literatur pendidikan digital. Hasil kajian menemukan bahwa AI telah menciptakan kondisi “algorithmic moral passivity” di mana peserta didik cenderung mendelegasikan pertimbangan etis kepada sistem otomatis, mengakibatkan erosi kapasitas ijtihad moral. Berdasarkan konsep ‘aql, nafs, dan ikhtiyar dalam Islam, penelitian ini menawarkan Model Rekonstruksi Agency Etis (MRAE) yang terdiri dari tiga dimensi: dimensi tazkiyatun nafs digital, dimensi fiqh teknologi, dan dimensi musyawarah algoritmik. Model ini diharapkan dapat menjadi kerangka operasional bagi guru PAI dalam merespons tantangan era AI secara transformatif dan kontekstual.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Alon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2023). Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making: “Automation Bias” and “Selective Adherence” to Algorithmic Advice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac007

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2021). What is Qualitative in Research. Qualitative Sociology, 44(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09497-w

Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022a). Algorithmic Bias in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9

Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022b). Algorithmic Bias in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9

Baumann, L., Spangenberger, P., Birkefeld, K., Dörre, M., Bollmacher, L., & Nebel, S. (2026). Social Networking Site Use and Adolescents Empathic Skills: A Systematic Literature Review. Adolescent Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-025-00279-x

Bojic, L. (2024). AI alignment: Assessing the global impact of recommender systems. Futures, 160, 103383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2024.103383

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

De Loyola González-Salgado, I., Rivera-Navarro, J., Gutiérrez-Sastre, M., Conde, P., & Franco, M. (2024). Conducting member checking within a qualitative case study on health-related behaviours in a large European city: Appraising interpretations and co-constructing findings. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 28(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593221109682

Elmahjub, E. (2023a). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Ethics: Towards Pluralist Ethical Benchmarking for AI. Philosophy & Technology, 36(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x

Elmahjub, E. (2023b). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Ethics: Towards Pluralist Ethical Benchmarking for AI. Philosophy & Technology, 36(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x

Hasibuan, U. S., Utami, P. I., Novia, S., Surahman, C., & Sumarna, E. (2024). Konsep Khalifah dalam Qs. Al-Baqarah/ 2: 30 dan Implikasinya Terhadap Tujuan Pendidikan Islam di Era Society 5.0. JOURNAL OF QUR’AN AND HADITH STUDIES, 13(2), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v13i2.42166

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022a). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022b). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Lewin, K. M., Kaur, A., & Meshi, D. (2023). Problematic Social Media Use and Impulsivity. Current Addiction Reports, 10(3), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-023-00495-2

Lloyd, N., Hyett, N., & Kenny, A. (2024). To Member Check or not to Member Check? An Evaluation of Member Checking in an Interpretive Descriptive Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241301383. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241301383

Mahmud, H., Islam, A. K. M. N., Ahmed, S. I., & Smolander, K. (2022). What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121390

Morris, R., Moretta, T., & Potenza, M. N. (2023). The Psychobiology of Problematic Use of Social Media. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 10(4), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-023-00261-8

Muhaimin, M., Fajrie, N., & Setiawan, D. (2021). Respon Kognitif Anak dalam Produk Permainan Remitan Desa Mayong Lor Jepara. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(5), 1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v2i5.803

Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w

Nguyen, T. N. M., Whitehead, L., Dermody, G., & Saunders, R. (2022). The use of theory in qualitative research: Challenges, development of a framework and exemplar. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15053

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Taha, J. Z. A., Sulaiman, S. Z., & Ajmain@Jima’ain, M. T. (2025). The Use of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) in Islamic Education: An Analysis of Challenges, Opportunities, and Ethical Considerations Based on Maqasid Shariah. Journal of Research, Innovation, and Strategies for Education (RISE), 2(3), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.70148/rise.v2i3.3

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Walker, L. J. (1980). Cognitive and perspective-taking prerequisites for moral development. Child Development, 131–139.